Value calculated using the KDJ function does not match value in market data
Author: 2013goto, Created: 2019-06-20 00:19:12, Updated:Real-disk retest, KDJ values calculated using KDJ default parameters 9, 3, 3 do not match the true values. Don't know where the problem is?)
)
)
)
More
- Please teach me about the IO function error reporting problem.
- OKEX期货回测时，不支持exchange.GetPosition吗？
- Is there a bug in the optimization of retest parameters?
- Commodity futures suddenly stopped when they were reset.
- What if Telegram misses some information?
- The president of Macroprudential Futures - Is there still a problem with penetration regulation?
- Please help me to see what is going on, what can I do?
- If you're trying to write a dynamic balancing strategy in Python, I'll show you.
- Where can you find an example of how the Ma language retracts futures, how to set up the number of trades, the variety of trades, etc.?
- The newcomer is looking to offer a ZG exchange's general protocol plugin.
- Events-driven issues when retesting
- Historical K-line data obtained incorrectly in the analogue retest
- Please teach me, if you can use the formula to send a warning message.
- Pay to write a strategy.
- The trade issue
- A newcomer, asking for God's help to fix the YOBIT General Protocol plugin
- How to get a real-time price for Ma
- How to write a K-string operation multiple times
- Ask how the JS language calls two cycles of K-strings at the same time.
- fcoin fmex grab plug-in for the self-service plugin you need
lpf820123Since TradingView uses its own set of indicator calculation modules, and there is a difference between it and talib, it makes no sense to compare it to TradingView.
The Little DreamKDJ has a post, you can check it out at https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/27300549 It's the same as comparing it to Chinese finance.