Dear friends, I encountered a BUG in optimizing parameters in retesting. There are two parameters that need to be optimized, a total of 10*10 = 100 combinations, and every time I get to the second or third set of parameters, the optimization results start to be the same as the previous set, but in fact it is obvious that the results should not be the same, how to solve this problem, I have changed the private host and still can not solve it.
lpf820123The problem is that the parameters to be optimized should not be assigned in the program, so no wonder the results are the same every time!
Inventors quantifiedYou can multiply these two parameters into LogProfit parameters, so that the retest results can show if there really is this bug, and I just optimized with a strategy of only two parameters, and the printed results are in line with the array. What's up? LogProfit ((A*B)) What's up?
lpf820123I've done the tests separately, and I've done the tests separately, and I've done the tests separately.
The Little DreamIt is possible to make further judgments before determining if it is a BUG. You can test the parameters that are repeated twice separately, i.e. without adjusting the parameters, and test them separately. Compare the detailed transaction records of the two tests to see if anything went wrong. Based on past experience, it may be that something went wrong in your review.
The Little DreamIn general, you can't change the parameters in the policy.
The Little DreamWe can also add a WeChat group, the homepage has a WeChat group with a 2D code.
lpf820123QQ group needs verification, how is it passed?
The Little DreamYou can view the screenshot, or add the QQ group, contact the administrator, and send the screenshot.