There is always someone who says there is no spread, there is always a 1% spread, 10 times the spread is 10% of the profit (some say 10 times the spread is 5% of the profit).
So I decided to go with the monkey season and the weekly period.
After a few days, the price actually went up to 1%, and I was almost full. Then on Friday, when the week was delivered, I manually moved the week to the next week before the delivery.
I've been thinking about returning the premium next week, and maybe I'll be able to come back.
As a result, the premium continued to expand the next week, 1.8% and I was full early. On Friday, again, 5% loss. Now, even if you return to the market, you can not compensate for the loss, you lose the week.
Now, this week, the bull market is still bullish, it wants to lose less, it can't.
This model doesn't work?
Please show me where I went wrong. Thank you.
daniaorenThere's no reason to have a regression to the mean over time, it's all based on statistical significance, I wouldn't dare to do it.
The Old TreeBrother you still there, who said that there is no risk in the long term, and the long term is not necessarily returning, if the spread in the long term widened further, you will still lose.
The King of Hip HopI think this post is on fire.
excmIf you lose money this time, the next time you lose, you won't be able to make money.
The EarthThe deadline, plus the grid!
The grassIt's not 100% profitable either, the strategy is risky.
The grassThe difference is that the price is split into lots, and the lot is flat.
The Witch:) I wanted to ask you if you're still here.
The WitchOh, my God.
The WitchVery small
The WitchThank you very much, I can't go back alone, the loss is too great every week.