If you do ETH_USDT contracts using a full-stock model, the same position, for example 10000USDT capital, each position is 10 ETH, then in fact it should be safer with high leverage, because the high leverage used is less capital, otherwise the same position, so that each time the capital is used is less; used again is a full-stock mode, the position is the same loss, in general it should be safer, don't understand right? please tell me!!
programIf you have more collateral left over, you're borrowing more money, and it's not about risk.
programRisk and leverage factor are not related, they are related to the number of holdings, high leverage only increases your utilization of funds, the remaining collateral can open more positions
AlanCloushIf it's a whole stock, the risk is the same in theory. If it's a one-off model, then high-leverage small collateral can avoid stop-loss failures for various reasons under extreme conditions.
It was like a hallucination.The risk should depend on the actual leverage, i.e. the value of the position divided by the total capital. The advantage of high leverage is lower collateral and more flexibility
Neo1898Security, I think, is about reducing the likelihood of an explosion.
Neo1898Let's say that the higher leverage is less, so the actual leverage is lower, so that's it.
The Little DreamThis is how you define a safe kitchen. Safety 1: Less damage and less damage. Safety 2: Reduce the likelihood of an explosion.
The grassLook at the actual leverage, opening amount/total equity
programNo, it is not.
Neo1898But with the high leverage, the working capital is low, so the strong price is farther away, reducing the chances of a boom!
The grassIt is the same with the capital and the opening amount, but with different leverage risks.